|
|
Article
Immigration will determine your future
Guest Opinion by Mikc McGarry,Spokesman, Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform (CAIR)
Colorado Daily (Boulder, CO) May 24, 2002
"If individual Americans really care ... about our children and
grandchildren, we cannot help but focus on the fundamental issue which
threatens national well being in the near future: relentless population
growth." - David Durham,
Carrying Capacity Network
Because of mass immigration, America will double in population within the
lifetimes of today's college students. So for most of you reading this, you
will be at ground zero when our current 286 million Americans explodes to a
possible 1.2 billion, exceeding India's current population by century's end.
Ninety percent of that unimaginable human pile-on will be immigration
driven.
When I was attending CU in 1970, the US was a fairly comfortable 203 million
residents. Indeed, 200 million is thought by many to be America's optimal
carrying capacity, the sustainable number of people supportable over the
over long-term. Since 1970 we have added a huge 83 million to the US
population. That's more than the populations of most countries of the
world, and nearly 70 percent of that unmonitored growth was immigration
generated.
Consider just these two facts. Because of immigration-driven population
pressures, 25 percent of our underground aquifers are not now recharging at
their natural rates. Since 1970 we have urbanized and degraded more than 30
million acres of farmland to make way for the millions, causing us to now
import a significant percentage of our fruits and vegetables. Think what it
will be like when you and a half-billion or more are competing for that much
less food and water. Continuous population growth is unsustainable.
Almost all of the world's population explosion, 80 million additions every
year, comes from the Third World. Studies show that the opportunity of
emigrating, even the hope or prospect of emigrating, keeps those countries
and cultures with explosive population growth rates from moving toward
demographic stability. That explains why, when recently asked what he
intended to do about the fact that his country would double its population
within 40 years, the president of Bangladesh presumptuously said he would
just send his extra people to the "underpopulated US."
There are those who say, "America is a country of immigrants", implying any
amount of immigration, regardless of the numbers, is traditional and proper.
But from 1776 to 1976 America averaged only 230,000 immigrants, yearly.
Remember, that average includes the great immigrating numbers during the
turn-of-the-century's Great Wave, when the US was only 76 million
inhabitants, industrializing and still expanding west. Contrasting
historical averages with today's nontraditional immigration engorgement of
at least 1.5 million permanent additions annually should provide a
much-needed perspective to an otherwise distorted historical picture.
The late US congresswoman Barbara Jordan said, "It is both a right and a
responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it
serves the national interest." America is full. It is your right and
responsibility to demand the US Congress establish and enforce an
immigration reduction moratorium of 100,000 legal immigrants a year. Even
if that number were imposed today, you still would not see the country's
population growth rate stabilize until about 325 million, nearly 40 million
additions. It's your future.
____________
Back Home
|
|