Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don’t match

Article CAIRCO note: 
Pennsylvania democrats are changing the rules so they can steal the election
Article publisher: 
Geller Report
Article date: 
20 October 2020
Article category: 
National News
Medium
Article Body: 

Unbelievable corruption from the Left. Changing the rules of an election with just over a week is beyond disgraceful. But this is the world that we live in because of the corrupt Dems, who know they can’t defeat President Trump fairly. G-d help us if the Democrats take power on November 3rd. Watch your back, Mr. President. Vote in person, America.

Pennsylvania democrats are methodically changing the rules so they can steal the election. It is amazingly open, dishonest, ruthless and will work unless the state ( especially Philadelphia) is flooded with law enforcement.

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) October 23, 2020

 

Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don’t match, by Washington Times, October 23, 2020

Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruled Friday that election officials must accept mail-in ballots even if the signatures on them don’t match those on file for a voter.

The justices said nothing in the state’s laws required signatures to be verified, so if election officials are satisfied with the vote save for the signature, they cannot reject it....

President Trump’s campaign had challenged the state over the issue.
 
Signature matching is considered a key check in many states that run elections through the mail, and election officials are trained in how to spot matches and to question signatures that don’t appear to match....

Related

South Carolina Federal Judge, Obama Appointee, Rules Signatures Don’t Have to Match Absentee Ballots, Breitbart, October 28, 2020.