|
|
City of Aspen Passes Population Stabilization - Mass Immigration Resolution
Below is the opening statement by Aspen Councilman Terry Paulson, who
sponsored the resolution in December of 1999:
Fellow Council Members:
This resolution we will be considering for adoption tonight could be the most
important consideration we will ever make as representatives of our
constituents and their children.
Immigration-driven population increases are transforming America-already the
fastest growing country of all the developed countries of the world and the
third most populous country in the world-into a country of over a
half-a-billion within the near future, within the lifetime of our school
children.
In October, I attended and participated in a conference at the Aspen
Institute, called The Myth of Sustainable Growth. At that conference, I had
the privilege of hearing a remarkable talk,
Population, Immigration and Global Ethics,
by Jonette Christian, from Maine. Jonette is a family
therapist by profession, giving her a very special perspective on this matter
before us.
Here is some of what she said:
"As this future descends upon our children,
public silence about these numbers is deafening. And we are responding like
deer with headlights in our eyes-paralyzed or else indifferent-and we would
rather talk about almost anything else: urban sprawl, pollution... traffic,
declining fish stocks, falling water tables... [smart growth], overcrowded
schools, [highways and transportation]-anything to avoid blunt speech about
[immigration-driven] population numbers. Speaking to you as a family
therapist, this is the behavior of dysfunctional groups. They avoid
conversation about the pink elephant in the living room at all costs, and
they exhaust themselves in a flurry of helpful activity around peripheral
matters. We have agitated, confused and deluded ourselves with the illusion
that we are being overwhelmed by many, many problems-when in fact we have
primarily only one. But it is the one that terrifies us the most, and we
handle that terror by chattering endlessly about everything else.
Denying... [ignoring] and minimizing population growth in the 1990s is a hate
crime against future generations, and it must end"
And isn't that really the dilemma we are confronted with tonight? We can act
as a dysfunctional family by making "safe", reality-denying choices. We can
chose to support an ill-defined, general resolution in support of population
stabilization, making sure not to mention the I-word, immigration, the prime
driving force behind our reckless growth into a country of over a
half-a-billion souls. We can ignore prudent, necessary reduction numbers and
deny glaring facts that would otherwise encourage establishing a sound and
traditionally consistent flow of population stabilizing immigration. And by
doing so, we will effectively be choosing to foreclose the future of
America's and Colorado's children.
Or we can make the necessary, responsible and, yes, uncomfortable choice. We
can pass this resolution intact, a resolution written with carefully
considered language and with distinguished, learned support-the only real
hope for an eventual stable American population. And by doing that, we will
serve as the needed example for other representative bodies to act
affirmatively for their constituents, providing them with the opportunity to
join the small yet growing number of uncompromising voices now openly
acknowledging the emperor is indeed without cloths.
Finally, I am reminded of the frog-in-the-water analogy. You can put a frog
in water and turn up the heat little by little until the frog is dead. On the
other hand, drop a frog in boiling water and it immediately jumps out. We are
all in the pot of water, and the heat is being insidiously turned up, up and
up at the immigration knob.
Please, join me, by calling for this deadly, increasing heat to be turned
down now to health-giving, bath water temperatures, by passing this
resolution as written, and thereby insuring a sustainable future for America
and her children.
____________
Home
|
|