There are two classes of questions related to ongoing mass immigration into America. The first and most fundamental question is quite simply: do we want immigration at all? The second class involves second order policy questions of how many and from where.
Every country carries an “ethos” or philosophy about itself. That ethos runs through the core of its being. That ethos drives its laws, its actions, its history and its future.
Many of you are familiar with author/investigator James Simpson and may even have read his monograph that followed mine at the Center for Security Policy.
The U.S. has agreed to resettle refugees held by Australia in two offshore detention centers, although the number of people to be offered resettlement was not revealed.
... After denigrating millions of Trump supporters as “deplorable” and “irredeemable” earlier this year, Clinton then unctuously confessed on election eve: “I regret deeply how angry the tone of the campaign became.”
Note the classic textbook employment of the passive voice to evade personal responsibility.
If Hillary Clinton’s expansionist immigration policies were put into effect, the U.S. Muslim population could exceed France’s current Muslim population by the end of a President Clinton’s second term, according to data from Pew Research and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Sweden is my guess for the first European country to completely implode with the burden of needy Middle Eastern and African refugees (it has been my choice for years). Although, I admit, Germany (larger and wealthier) is working hard to catch up with Sweden.
