The Final Four Cases Against Donald Trump

There are four major legal actions underway attempting to drive Donald Trump off ballots and into jail. When we parse the left-wing legalese and talking points, they translate into one thing: The Left is petrified that Donald Trump will win, and, when he wins, he’ll go through the DC Establishment like a firestorm...

Number Four:

I’ve dealt with the Colorado case at length here and here, so I’ll let you read it for yourself. The short answer is to expect a 9-0 ruling in favor of The Donald from the Supreme Court. You can’t be guilty of a crime that can’t be defined, such as “insurrection,”... The grammar of the Constitution expressly defines “officers” as people appointed by the President. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to him.

Number Three:

The Georgia case is a Flagrant 2 foul. The basis for this assessment is rather simple. Everything Trump is accused of doing was part of his duty under the Take Care clause of the Constitution. As Paul Harvey used to say, “Now for the rest of the story.”...

Number Two:

This is going to be a case of déjà vu all over again. In the J6 case brought by Jack Smith, former Attorney General Ed Meese and law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson filed an amicus curiae (friend of the Court) brief detailing a major defect that’s almost a carbon copy of the Georgia case...

Jack Smith does not have the authority to conduct the underlying prosecution. Those actions can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices. Neither Smith nor the position of Special Counsel under which he purportedly acts meets those criteria....

And now for Number One:

You can be forgiven if this is a bit anticlimactic because the outcome is now so obvious. Jack Smith wasn’t involved in the Mar-a-Lago raid, so the defects in that warrant may have to be tackled a different way. But he did convene the Grand Jury, which a private citizen like Smith has no lawful power to do...