New York's Jews after Mamdani’s victory
... The question is how the Jews ought to deal with the fact that an open antisemite will soon rule America’s leading—if declining—city with its million-strong Jewish minority...
Quiescence
Historically, Diaspora Jews’ default option has been to keep quiet, avoid trouble, and hope for the best... but it always fails in the long term, with devastating consequences...
Flight
Jews are already leaving systemically antisemitic northern US cities for less racist southern municipalities. Under a Mamdani regime, this trend could accelerate...
It would, however, be a historical tragedy...
Organize
This struggle will require extensive organization and activism. What form this might take is not currently known. However, New York Jews have a good model in the form of the movement undertaken by British Jews to oppose the former neo-antisemitic head of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn...
New York Jews will have to accept that they are no longer a comfortable and prosperous community, but an embattled minority under existential threat that can no longer afford quiescence...
Resist
Finally, there is the “nuclear option.” If Mamdani’s tyranny will not yield to non-violent tactics and the neo-antisemites succeed in committing and getting away with increasingly violent atrocities, then New York Jews will have to look to their own physical self-defense...
... New York’s Jews, who, whether they know it or not, are about to become the vanguard of the struggle.
Counterpoint
The Bergeroning of Western Civilisation, by Theophilus Chilton, 10 July 2025:
... The West is currently replacing itself through mass immigration leading to demographic displacement. Common sense realities about human biodiversity which used to be widely known and accepted have been shuffled to the "fringe"... Indeed, large swathes of the social sciences (especially psychology and anthropology) have been corrupted by the promotion of unscientific and empirically unsupported notions of racial equality...
Who is behind all of this? Let’s be honest – even though you’re not supposed to say this anymore, the perversion of the social sciences, the promotion of mass immigration and the notion of egalitarian human fungibility, and the creation of the political and cultural environments that work to systematically hobble the capacity of Western nations to uphold their own interests is the result of tremendous Jewish influence in academia, politics, and the media, as has been extensively documented by Kevin MacDonald in his book The Culture of Critique...
MacDonald thoroughly describes the systematic efforts by Jewish leaders in the United States and Europe to promote their own ethnic in-group concerns at the expense of the concerns of their gentile hosts. Among these concerns is the promotion of mass non-white immigration into the West as a way of diluting the political and cultural influence of the predominant white majorities in those nations, thus creating division and a weakening of gentile political power, which can then be picked up by Jewish leaders posing as the patrons of the non-white immigrants...
As a result, the purpose (and thus the subsequent effect) of the American immigration reform of 1965, as well as the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan in the European Union, has been to steadily deracinate the white Western world and replace it with a "diverse" (and presumably more compliant) population drawn from various parts of the third world...
The end result of this mass immigration, of course, has been the intentional handicapping of the West...
The rejection of the very concept of racial differences in IQ and the attempt to relegate it to the status of pseudoscience, outweighed by environmental factors, serves to reduce the social status and power of the higher IQ groups who were responsible for building and maintaining the preeminent civilization of the West...
In essence, Western cultures are transitioning from being “innovator” societies to being “maintainer” societies...
Related
Soros Funneled $37 Million to Jihad Communist Zohran Mamdani
Identity Politics: squabbling factions