New York Judge Rules that Continued Absentee Mail-In Voting Based on COVID is Unconstitutional

Article publisher: 
Gateway Pundit
Article date: 
24 October 2022
Article category: 
National News
Tags: 
Democrat
election
disease
Article link: 
Excerpts are included below - read the original complete article
Medium
Article Body: 

A judge in New York ruled that the continued use of COVID as the excuse for using absentee ballots in elections is not constitutional.

The New York Post reported on this ruling out of the state:

Allowing New Yorkers to vote by mail due to fear of COVID-19 is unconstitutional, a state judge said Friday in a ruling that Republican and Conservative Party leaders hailed as a victory for fair elections.

The 28-page ruling by Saratoga County Supreme Court Justice Dianne Freestone ordered local boards of election to stop counting the absentee ballots they’ve already received.

Democrats in the state are appealing the ruling. They know that without cheating, they have no chance of winning elections.

In the 2020 Election one of the means that the Democrats stole the election was related to absentee ballots.

We saw mules involved in dropping off ballots in drop boxes in the movie 2000 Mules....

Article final link: 
The above article contains excerpts - we encourage you to read the complete original article
The CAIRCO Report
Advocating for the rights of future generations of Americans.
Our primary focus includes issues of Western Civilization, American sovereignty, sustainability,
and the environmental and societal consequences of unending immigration-driven population growth.
This website is a project of Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform (CAIRCO) - founded in the mid 1990s.
Copyright 1995-2024 Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform
Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration and the transformation of America. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/108, https://www.law.cornell.edu/treaties/berne/10.html, and https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fair_use. In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.