Trump's Executive Order Has Election Officials Terrified

Article subtitle: 
Don’t believe the hype about the Supreme Court ending Trump’s effort to clean up mail-in ballots.
Article author: 
Jack Gleason
Article publisher: 
American Thinker
Article date: 
25 September 2026
Article category: 
National News
Medium
Article Body: 

... They want you to believe federal oversight was turned back, leaving local election practices completely untouched for the midterm cycle.

Don’t buy it...

On March 31, 2026, the administration issued EO 14399 to enforce citizenship verification and administrative integrity in federal elections...

Using the Postal Service to stop mailing ballots to dead addresses, vacant lots, and unverified locations was a brilliant idea that eliminates potential fraud before it starts...

On September 14, SCOTUS issued an emergency hold to avoid disrupting active election preparations but left the broader legal merits undecided...

The biggest impact from EO 14399 wasn’t at a post office but on the personal risk calculation of every local official and poll worker handling our ballots.

For decades, a major vulnerability in election administration was the lack of direct personal accountability...

That dynamic is over.

Buried beneath headlines about postal stays is the core enforcement framework established in Sections 1 and 3 of the order, which explicitly instructs the Department of Justice to prioritize direct criminal investigations and prosecutions of state and local officials who issue federal ballots to ineligible individuals or violate election laws...

Now, if the DOJ proves an official knowingly violated election rules, that official faces severe federal criminal statutes...

If you spot election rules being broken, notice local irregularities, or witness staff ignoring statutory mandates, you can take direct action...

Related

Trump Admin Releases Blueprint To Protect Election Infrastructure Ahead Of Midterms, by Shawn Fleetwood, The Federalist, 25 September 2026.

Ballot Busting