Home > Tags

Congress

Don't be discouraged-amnesty bill moves to the Senate floor

On June 11, 2013, 82 Senators voted YES to stop a filibuster. That vote allowed the Motion to Proceed to send the Amnesty bill, s.774, to the Senate floor.

But don't be alarmed by that number, even though it is far above the 60 votes needed on the all-important final filibuster vote later this month. 

A number of the Senators who voted to proceed have announced over the last few days that they will eventually vote against the bill unless it is significantly changed on the floor ...

.............

Congratulations to all of you from those three states who have done such a remarkable job of helping those Senators understand both where the voters are in your state and also the moral and practical imperative of stopping this bill. 

Kirk of Illinois

Crapo of Idaho

Risch of Idaho

Barrasso of Wyoming

Back in 2007, we also lost big on this procedural first vote to bring that amnesty bill to the floor. But we built on the solid opposition of a strong bloc of Senators to kill the amnesty on the final vote later.

HERE ARE TODAY'S CHAMPIONS WHO TRIED TO STOP THE AMNESTY BILL IN ITS TRACKS

ALABAMA: Sessions & Shelby

ARKANSAS: Boozman

IDAHO: Crapo & Risch

ILLINOIS: Kirk

IOWA: Grassley

KANSAS: Roberts

LOUISIANA: Vitter

OKLAHOMA: Inhofe

SOUTH CAROLINA: Scot

TEXAS: Cruz

UTAH: Lee

WYOMING: Barrasso & Enzi

Everybody else voted YES, except for three who didn't vote:

ALASKA: Murkowski

ARIZONA: McCain

OKLAHOMA: Coburn

 

Spanish-language ads target Rep. Mike Coffman over deportation

Democrats hope to fire up Latino voters in Colorado over a U.S. House vote last week to de-fund President Barack Obama's program to extend temporary legal status to immigrants who entered the country illegally as children.
 
 
Monday targeting Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colorado) for voting with most other most Republicans to effectively undo the deferred-deportation program, which has been criticized as a form of executive-branch amnesty.
 
Listen to the ad here: http://bit.ly/18olhu3 
"Congressman Coffman wants to restart the deportations of 800,000 young people who grew up in this country, worked hard and are just looking for their chance to achieve the American dream," a Spanish-speaking announcer said...
 
"It's hypocritical and dishonest for Washington Democrats to criticize anyone for having extreme views on immigration when they hand-picked Andrew Romanoff," Tyler Houlton, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said. "It's hypocritical and dishonest for Washington Democrats to criticize anyone for having extreme views on immigration when they hand-picked Andrew Romanoff, who once bragged about passing the toughest anti-immigration laws in the nation as Speaker of the Colorado House."
____________________
 
CAIRCO Research
 
Tyler Houlton 
Deputy Policy Director & Policy Press Secretary
 
Tyler Q. Houlton is the Deputy Policy Director and Policy Press Secretary for the National Republican Congressional Committee. Prieviously, Houlton served as the Western Regional Spokesman for the NRCC, the Communications Director for Colorado Congressmen Tom Tancredo and Mike Coffman, and Deputy Campaign Manager for Ryan Frazier’s 2010 congressional campaign.
 
 
REACH US AT: 202-479-7000
 
FOR PRESS INQUIRIES: 202-479-7070
___________
 
U.S. Representative Mike Coffman 
 
Washington, D.C. 20515 
Phone: (202) 225-7882 
Fax: (202) 226-4623
 
Aurora, CO 80014
Phone: (720) 748-7514
Fax: (720) 748-7680

House votes to resume deporting young DREAM Act immigrants

[...] The Republican-controlled House voted Thursday to resume the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought illegally to the United States as children, the first immigration-related vote in either chamber of Congress this year and a measure of the daunting challenge facing supporters of a sweeping overhaul of existing law on the subject.
 
The party-line vote of 224-201 was aimed at blocking implementation of President Barack Obama's 2012 election-year order to stop deportations of many so-called DREAM Act individuals. Democrats on the House floor reacted with boos when the provision was added to a routine spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security.
 
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said in a statement that the vote prohibits the administration "from implementing executive amnesty" without congressional action. "Bipartisan support for my amendment is the first test of the 113th Congress in the House of Representatives on immigration. My amendment blocks many of the provisions that are mirrored in the Senate's `Gang of Eight' bill. If this position holds, no amnesty will reach the President's desk," he said.

Senate Immigration Bill Could Create Millions of New Voters in 6 Months

The Rubio-Schumer immigration bill in the Senate would legalize around 11 million [to 30 million] currently illegal immigrants [illegal aliens] 6 months after passage. Most would have to wait over a decade to become citizens, but they would be legal immigrants under Federal law. 
 
If a current proposal in New York City is adopted, they would also be able to vote in municipal elections. The city is considering extended voting rights to legal immigrants.
 
If the New York City proposal passes, it is likely that other cities will consider similar expansions of the voting rolls. Already 4 towns in Massachusetts and a half-dozen cities in Maryland allow non-citizen immigrants to vote. This is the challenge of rushing massive federal legislation through our federalist system. Federal law does not exist in a vacuum, but effects laws at all levels of government... 
 

Rubio Continues to Not Get It on Immigration

As those following the Schumer-Rubio medicine show have heard, amnesty for the illegal population would require only that Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security submit a plan to control the border (technically, two plans — a “Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy” and a “Southern Border Fencing Strategy”). The idea that such parchment barriers, as Madison might have called them, are sufficient to ensure that amnesty isn’t followed by continued illegal immigration has occasioned much derision. It’s just another way that Rubio and the rest of Chuck Schumer’s Republicans are saying, through their support of this travesty, that “We Trust Barack Obama.”...

Congress has already tried this approach of specifying the details of a border-control strategy, to little effect. The Secure Fence Act of 2006 (pdf here, but don’t worry — remarkably, it’s only three pages long) lays out in extraordinary detail where “at least 2 layers of reinforced fencing” are supposed to be built along the Mexican border:

  • ‘‘(i) extending from 10 miles west of the Tecate, California, port of entry to 10 miles east of the Tecate, California, port of entry;
  • ‘‘(ii) extending from 10 miles west of the Calexico, California, port of entry to 5 miles east of the Douglas, Arizona, port of entry;
  • ‘‘(iii) extending from 5 miles west of the Columbus, New Mexico, port of entry to 10 miles east of El Paso, Texas;
  • ‘‘(iv) extending from 5 miles northwest of the Del Rio, Texas, port of entry to 5 miles southeast of the Eagle Pass, Texas, port of entry; and
  • ‘‘(v) extending 15 miles northwest of the Laredo, Texas, port of entry to the Brownsville, Texas, port of entry.

In other words, Congress crafted the border plan at the outset, specifying where some 650 miles of fencing was to be placed, rather than leave the details up to the Obama Bush administration. How’d that work out?

There are only about 40 miles of such double fencing, with no plans for any more... Read more about Rubio Continues to Not Get It on Immigration

Cost of immigration overhaul worries Los Angeles officials

With an estimated 1.1 million people in L.A. County illegally, officials fear that the county will get stuck with many costs for those who apply for citizenship.

As the Senate Judiciary Committee began debating the bipartisan immigration bill last week, county officials voiced concerns that local taxpayers will be "left holding the bag" to pay for the brunt of healthcare and other services for multitudes of immigrants [illegal aliens] who apply for citizenship.
 
..."The one thing that's really clear as day is that the federal government is going to be protecting itself against costs, and we're going to be left holding the bag," said Mark Tajima, an analyst with the county's chief administrative office.
 
In Washington last week for the start of the debate, county officials, including Supervisors Don Knabe and Zev Yaroslavsky, warned of a "major cost shift'' to state and local governments from the proposed legislation and pressed Congress to provide federal aid to help cover future costs.

Immigration bill could end much-prized green card lottery

In the contentious debate over immigration policy, three groups have dominated public and political attention: the roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants seeking to become legal, the skilled foreign workers bound for high-tech jobs and relatives waiting to be reunited with their families.

Then there are those who won the green card lottery.
 
..."In my country, whole cities wait to hear the results of this lottery. I can't believe they would take it away," said Ermais Amirat, 29, an Ethiopian lottery winner who lives in Alexandria, Va., and drives a limousine. "We may not earn a lot, but on $200 a month, your whole family can survive back home."
 
Under a Senate compromise, the program would be eliminated and its visa slots would be subsumed into a broad system that stresses skills, education and other criteria for legal immigration.
 
...Mark Jacobsen, a lawyer in Hawaii who has helped hundreds of lottery applicants in the past 20 years, called the scams a "huge problem" that has gotten worse with reliance on the Internet. "People set up websites that mimic the official U.S. government sites," he said in a telephone interview. "They send out emails telling people they have won and that they have to send a $1,000 processing fee right away. In fact, there is no official fee at all."
 
The relatively lax requirements for lottery applications have also aroused concerns that it can allow terrorists to slip into the country. To be eligible, someone must be an adult from one of the listed countries, have a high school degree or two years' work experience, and have no criminal record.
 
In 2002, an Egyptian terrorist who shot and killed two people in Los Angeles was found to be in the United States through his wife's diversity visa. Mohamed Atta, another Egyptian and one of the Sept. 11 pilots who died attacking the World Trade Center, had applied twice for the lottery before entering the United States on a different visa to study aviation.
 
Jacobsen, whose company processed Atta's unsuccessful lottery application, called the terrorist concern a "red herring" because winners must undergo full background checks and interviews before being granted their visas. "People think if you win, you just get your visa and go," he said. "It's a lot more difficult than that."

Social Security Administration Study: Immigration bill would help Social Security

A bipartisan immigration bill pending in the Senate would strengthen the Social Security trust fund by adding millions of workers to tax rolls, and provide a boost to the overall economy, according to an analysis Wednesday by the Social Security Administration.

The finding came in a letter to Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who requested the analysis, from Stephen C. Gross, chief actuary for the agency.
 
It could provide a boost for the immigration bill, which has been attacked by some conservatives as overly costly, as the Senate Judiciary Committee prepares to take up the legislation for amendments and votes beginning Thursday. Meanwhile, a separate dispute loomed as religious leaders warned that adding a gay rights provision to the immigration legislation could cost their support.
 
Gross' analysis said the immigration bill would boost Social Security's coffers by more than $240 billion over the coming decade and add $64 billion in new tax revenues to Medicare. It also would increase the size of the economy by a full percentage point by 2017, and increase employment.
 
[...] The Social Security analysis doesn't attempt to determine the overall cost of the bill. That figure will be provided by the Congressional Budget Office, which has not yet released its projections.
 

CAIRCO Research
 

No poor and huddled need apply-immigration legislation would cost taxpayers $6.3 trillion

Jim DeMint, president of the Heritage Foundation, comments on a study that shows immigration legislation would cost taxpayers $6.3 trillion to provide government benefits for millions of people now living in the U.S. illegally.... 

Heritage Foundation President Jim DeMint prefaced his condemnation of immigration legislation Monday with the same form of inoculation conservatives often use on such occasions: He quoted Emma Lazarus.

"There's a statement at the bottom of the Statue of Liberty," said the former Republican senator who just took over as chief of the powerful think tank. "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses ... ."

He and his colleagues then went on to outline their version of immigration reform: No poor and huddled need apply.

"We feel that the best immigration system is one that focuses on bringing high school [graduate] immigrants in," said Robert Rector, the Heritage scholar seated beside DeMint for the rollout of a new study on the costs of immigration. "We think the proper policy is that you shouldn't be bringing immigrants into the U.S. that by and large are going to impose additional costs on U.S. taxpayers by getting more benefits than they pay in taxes."

DeMint called this a "merit-based" system in which those who are skilled and can pay their way are admitted. "A properly structured, merit-based lawful immigration system holds the potential to drive positive economic growth and increase the standard of living of American citizens," he said. "We need an immigration system that attracts workers our economy needs and encourages patriotic assimilation."

Latinos have been suspicious of Republicans in part because they assume that conservatives' desire to crack down on illegal immigration may extend to legal immigration as well. Republicans invariably proclaim that they are big fans of legal immigration. But the Heritage doctrine undermines that, because it would sharply curtail Hispanic immigration — legal and illegal alike.

Of the Mexican-born people in the United States age 25 and older, nearly 60 percent didn't graduate from high school ...


 

CAIRCO Research

The Statue of Liberty was erected in 1886, when world population was little more than one billion and the U.S. population was 60 million. Many do not realize that the Statue of Liberty was a gift to the U.S. from France, with the title, "Liberty Enlightening the World". The statue and its symbolism had nothing to do with immigration, but rather hope that the rest of the world would adopt Democracy. The Emma Lazurus plaque (it is not chiseled in the base), "send me your huddled masses" was added ten years later during the immigration peak of that age.

The sonnet, "New Colossus", was written by Emma Lazarus in 1883 as part of a literary campaign to raise funds for the completion of the Statue's pedestal. Not much attention was paid to it until the tide of immigration surged at the turn of the century. Proceeds that were raised from its auction were used to complete the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty. This plaque memorialized the sonnet in 1903 and was placed on the inner wallof the Statue's pedestal. It currently is displayed inside the Statue of Liberty museum.

Since then, U.S. population has expanded by 4 1/2 times. The U.S. is the world's highest-consuming (and most wasteful) nation, and is no longer in need of settlement. Read more about No poor and huddled need apply-immigration legislation would cost taxpayers $6.3 trillion

Gang of Eight makes it easier for Asylum Seekers, like Boston Marathon Suspects, to come to U.S.

The Gang of Eight’s 844-page immigration reform legislation makes it easier for asylum seekers to come to America. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, the Boston Marathon bomber suspect, who was apprehended last Friday, after he was found wounded in a boat in Watertown, Boston, after the Boston Marathon bombings that killed three people and injured nearly 200 others, came to America legally by claiming asylum with his father ...

According to the New York Times, “Anzor Tsarnaev and his younger son [Dzhokhar] first came to the United States legally in April 2002 on 90-day tourist visas… Once in this country, the father applied for political asylum, claiming he feared deadly persecution based on his ties to Chechnya. Dzhokhar, who was 8, applied for asylum under his father’s petition.”
 
We go now to page 551 of the Gang of Eight’s “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act,” Subtitle D-Asylum and Refugee Provisions, Sec. 3401. Time Limits and Efficient Adjudication of Genuine Asylum Claims ...
 
Next, we learn that the Gang of Eight wants to give people, who were previously denied, another chance. Discretion (which arguably goes to credibility) has been taken off the table. Additionally, the 1-year time frame to file has been arbitrarily extended to 2-years ...
 
From page 552 of the Gang of Eight’s bill:
 
“‘(D) MOTION TO REOPEN CERTAIN MERITORIOUS CLAIMS.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) or section 240(c)(7), an alien may file a motion to reopen an asylum claim during the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act if the alien—”(i) was denied asylum based solely upon a failure to meet the 1-year application filing deadline in effect on the date on which the application was filed; “(ii) was granted withholding of removal pursuant to section 241(b)(3) and has not obtained lawful permanent residence in the United States pursuant to any other provision of law; “(iii) is not subject to the safe third country exception in subsection (a)(2)(A) or a bar to asylum under subsection (b)(2) and should not be denied asylum as a matter of discretion; and “(iv) is physically present in the United States when the motion is filed (bold mine).”
 
[...] Meanwhile Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) of the Gang of Eight continue to insist that their immigration reform bill, must be passed because, “Immigration reform will strengthen our nation’s security by helping us identify exactly who has entered our country and who has left—a basic function of government that our broken immigration system is incapable of accomplishing today.” 

CAIRCO Background

 
April 20, 2013
Anzor Tsarnaev and his younger son first came to the United States legally in April 2002 on 90-day tourist visas, federal law enforcement officials said. Once in this country, the father applied for political asylum, claiming he feared deadly persecution based on his ties to Chechnya. Dzhokhar, who was 8, applied for asylum under his father’s petition, the officials said.
 
Tamerlan Tsarnaev came to the United States later, and applied for American citizenship on Sept. 5 last year, federal law enforcement officials said.
 

  Read more about Gang of Eight makes it easier for Asylum Seekers, like Boston Marathon Suspects, to come to U.S.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Congress