Home > Tags

environment

Immigration to fuel future population growth

Immigration will be the primary driver of population growth in the United States within a few decades, a milestone not seen in almost two centuries, the Census Bureau projected Wednesday.

The Census Bureau said immigration will outstrip natural increase — the difference between births and deaths for the total population - by as early as 2027, but no later than 2038. The differing scenarios depend on how many immigrants continue coming to the U.S.

If immigration levels are high, the census said, non-Hispanic whites would become a minority in the country as early as 2041...

 


CAIRCO Notes:

This article rests upon the fundamental but flawed thesis that Americans have no right to control our demographic destiny.

American women voluntarily reached replacement level fertility (2.1 children per woman) in 1972. Yet mass immigration is driving US population to double within the lifetimes of children born today.

America is not the dumping ground for foreign job seekers in transit looking for subsistence-level wages. Similarly, America is not simply an assemblage of consumers bettering the corporate bottom line. 

The United States can not grow indefinitely with finite borders. We are already severely impacting our sustaining ecosystems, while siphoning resources - notably petroleum - from foreign nations.

We have every right - and responsibility - to control our population destiny.

 

  Read more about Immigration to fuel future population growth

Video: Immigration Reform - Colorado State of Mind

A look at immigration reform being proposed by the bipartisan "Gang of 8". Panelists include Colorado University Professor Philip Cafaro (with Progressives for Immigration Reform and Immigration Environmental Impact Statement), and former Congressman Tom Tancredo. Panelists also include an immigration attorney and a former illegal alien who was amnestied in 1986 who now uses eVerify in her business.

Watch the video (27 minutes). Read more about Video: Immigration Reform - Colorado State of Mind

Sierra Club sells out on immigration - again

When John Muir founded the Sierra Club 121 years ago, he instilled a deep environmental ethic. Muir observed:

“When we tug at a single thing in nature, we find it attached to the rest of the world.”

Yet time has taken its toll within the Sierra Club, which no longer prioritizes environmental principles over financial fluidity and social involvement. While the membership still pays lip-service to environmental issues, management has become demonstrably corporatized.

In the mid 1990's, the Club did an abrupt turnaround to abandon their principled population position acknowledging that mass immigration was - and still is - the driving force behind US population doubling. (American women had already reached replacement level fertility - that is, 2.1 children per woman - in 1972).

Betrayed Sierra Club members tried to lead the Club back on the environmental track. As a former chair of SUSPS, the group spearheading that effort, I was amazed by our dedication. And dismayed by our naiveté.

It was later uncovered that the Club had received $100 million from super wealthy donor David Gelbaum, who said, "if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me."

Later, in a surprising 2008 business alliance, the Club began endorsing Clorox products.1 It seems that dollars consistently trump environmentalism, even in the Sierra Club. The alliances continued.

Recently, on April 24, 2013, the Sierra Club stunned its members with a blatant reversal of their 1996 ban on discussion of immigration policy. Just after board election results were announced - only 7.7 percent of nearly half a million members voted - the board unilaterally declared the Club's "strong support for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants".2

So now the Sierra Club now openly supports amnesty for the 11 million to 40 million illegal aliens who are living within the United States. In the same announcement, the Club confirmed that they oppose securing America's southern border, saying this is for "environmental" reasons.3

The Club clearly has given cover to special interests who are demanding amnesty, unending US population growth, and more consumers for corporate products. These special interests can now say that environmental concerns related to amnesty for illegal aliens have been addressed - after all, the Sierra Club supports amnesty!

With the 1996 turnabout, the Sierra Club became an organization that supported population doubling over environmental protection. With their current support for amnesty, the Club has positioned themselves as an integral component of the special interest consortium who want growth, smart growth, and more growth.

The Sierra Club got $100 million in 1996 when they abandoned principles, and presumably made even more off the Clorox deal. We don't yet know what the payment was for this year's deal, but it is abundantly clear that the Sierra Club has sold its environmental soul.

 

References:

1. Sierra Club leader departs amid discontent over group's direction, Los Angeles Times, November 19, 2011
Clorox Courts Sierra Club, and a Product Is Endorsed, New York Times, March 26, 2008

2. A Path to the Future, Sierra Club, April 25, 2013
Sierra Club backs immigration reform, Politico, April 24, 2013

3. See Desert Invasion for documentation and photos of destruction by illegal aliens of America's border areas. Read more about Sierra Club sells out on immigration - again

Sierra Club is Hostile to America

In his April 6, 2013 article: "Dwyer: Sierra Club is Hostile to America" Mark Andrew Dwyer assailed the Sierra Club's opposition to nuclear energy, saying:

Sierra Club just took on San Onofre, Calif., nuclear power plant, urging the residents to demand cutting public funding for its operation...

Sierra Club already opposes coal-powered electric plants because they pollute... [and] also opposes hydroelectric plants because they disturb wildlife...

Now, Sierra Club turns against nuclear plants...

Sierra Club wants to move the clock of history back to the times when wind, sun, and human and animal work were the only direct sources of energy for human endeavor. Since at present time there is no known and tested way of turning the American economy onto wind-and-solar powered, if Sierra Club prevails in its demands then the economy will be decimated and most of us will have to rely on our heavy work to survive, just like our distant ancestors had...

Clearly the Sierra Club missed the boat, but not for the reasons Dwyer delineated. The pertinent question that must be asked is: why do we need more and more electric power? The answer is quite obvious: more and more people.

American women voluntarily adopted replacement level fertility (2.1 children per woman) in 1972. Our population was projected to increase some due to population momentum, where children would grow up to have children of their own while their parents were still alive, then our population would have gradually declined to a sustainable level.

All that changed, thanks to mass immigration - which is driving US population to double within the lifetimes of children born today.

Back in the early 1990's, the Sierra Club understood the population - environment connection, and embraced a population policy which included reducing mass immigration as the driving force behind our devastating population growth. But the Sierra Club sold out to the tune of a $100 million donation from megabucks donor David Gelbaum, who said to Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope:

I did tell Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me."

The Sierra Club's gag order on immigration-driven population growth continues to this day. As a result, they merely tilt helplessly at the manifest symptoms of population growth.

While the Sierra Club clearly leaped off the boat in the name of profit, Dwyer doesn't even see the boat. Doubling America's population is imminently hostile to America. It will doubly diminish the natural ecosystems upon which we depend, including natural resources we draw down - such as water, farmland, and overseas oil.

Depleting our natural environment while doubling our population may indeed sentence future generations to the dire future which Dwyer forebodes and the Sierra Club implicitly embraces. Read more about Sierra Club is Hostile to America

Thomas Malthus foretold humanity’s gravest plight with clarity

“The power of population is so superior to the power of earth to produce subsistence to humanity that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.” Thomas Malthus 1798

Each year, across the planet, an estimated 10 million children die of starvation and starvation related diseases.  Additionally, eight million adults die of starvation and malnutrition.  Over two billion human beings cannot secure a clean glass of drinking water daily.  At least two billion humans live in lethal poverty, squalor and misery. (Source: www.worldhealthorganization.com)

Yet, without so much as a blink, yawn or sigh—the human race adds another 80 million people to the planet annually—without pause, without thought, without reason.

Mathis Wackernagel, President Global Footprint Network, said, “Today, humanity uses the equivalent of 1.5 planets to provide the resources we use and to absorb our emissions. The majority of countries and states operate their economies without tracking the ecological resources they use against what they actually have. It is like flying a plane without a fuel gauge, and it affects everything from what you pay at the grocery store to the type of world you and your children will live in.”  

On the European front, mass immigration threatens to destabilize the United Kingdom with a projected population increase of 11 million within two decades. Much the same occurs in Australia, America and Canada—otherwise maintaining stable populations.

What causes the problem?  Answer: third world fecundity rates add 1 billion people every 12 years.  America expects an added 100 million people by 2035—driven by immigration.   It faces irreversible consequences with unsolvable problems.

While most ‘experts’ denigrate "Malthus, the false prophet", Thomas Malthus' predictions manifest more today than in his own time.

As population rises, carrying capacity drops.  What is “carrying capacity”?  For a quick rendition, it means, “The amount resources on a given piece of land to allow long term sustainable human, plant and animal life.”

If animals or humans exceed “carrying capacity” of any given land mass, they crash in numbers by various means, i.e., famine, war, pestilence and disease.

For the 7.1 billion humans in the 21st century, oil resources will define that capacity quotient.  Noted Geologist Walter Youngquist said, “This is going to be an interesting decade, for the perfect storm is brewing—energy, immigration and oil imports.  China grows in direct confrontation for remaining oil.  I think the USA is on a big, slippery downhill slope.  Will the thin veneer of civilization survive?” To see how fast we grow, visit www.populationmedia.com [also see World Population Balance - ed.]

Youngquist continued, “Beyond oil, population is the number one problem of the 21st century, for when oil is gone as we know and use it today—and it WILL be gone—population will still be here.”

The world uses 84 million barrels daily.  That’s 42 gallons to a drum!  By mid-century, use will top 120-140 million barrels per day.  Oil will run out because of limited reserves in the ground.  As a shocking reality check: according to James Howard Kunstler, The Long Emergency, by 2030, China expects to burn 98 million barrels EVERY day. They add 27,000 new cars to their highways weekly according to NBC’s anchor Brian Williams.

Dr. Albert Bartlett of the University of Colorado said, “Present population growth rate is putting our children at risk.  They will experience holes in the ozone causing serious biological effects on plants and humans.  World ocean fisheries are collapsing from endless plundering.  Two thirds of the world’s people will suffer from water shortages by 2025.  It is not possible to sustain population growth or growth in rates of consumption of resources.”

Where is the worst overpopulation problem on the planet according to Dr. Bartlett?  “It’s right here in the United States!”

Dr. Bartlett said, “Can you think of any problem, on any scale, from microscopic to global, whose long-term solution is in any demonstrable way, aided, assisted, or advanced, by having continued population growth—at the local level, the state level, the national level, or globally?”

How many people in the United States constitute enough?  How far down the rabbit hole do we want to dig ourselves?  At what point is enough—too much?  If we shut down the borders today with zero immigration, while enjoying our sustainable 2.03 fertility level of American women on average, we would still grow via “population momentum” by an added 40 million. [Also see U.S. Birth Rates and Population Growth - ed.]

We paint ourselves into a perilous corner. Once the numbers manifest, our society will suffer irreversible consequences with unsolvable problems.  One visit to Los Angeles will show you they suffer toxic air, dwindling safe drinking water, gridlock to the point of insanity, water shortages, endless highways and housing development.  Consider San Francisco, Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Detroit, Denver and all other large cities grow beyond the bounds of reason!  

Sustainable growth, slow growth, managed growth, smart growth and all other kinds of growth prove oxymoronic.  Sustainable growth cannot be sustained.  Why? All growth exceeds carrying capacity at some point.  In other words, the bubble bursts, the dam breaks, the glass spills, the balloon pops and the red-lined engine blows up.

“Population growth is given as a cause of the problems identified, but eliminating the cause is not mentioned as a solution,” Bartlett said. “We are prescribing aspirin for cancer.”

At the current rate of growth driven by immigration, America will double its population near the end of the 21st century—from 300,000,000 to 625,000,000.  As long as the underlying cause of a problem is not dealt with, we, and our leaders, as a nation, perpetuate a falsehood which Mark Twain called ‘silent-assertion’:  “Almost all lies are acts,” he said.  “I am speaking of the lie of ‘silent-assertion’.  It would not be possible for a humane and intelligent person to invent a rational excuse for slavery; yet you will remember that in the early days of emancipation in the North, agitators got small help from anyone.  They could not break the universal stillness that reigned from the pulpit and press all the way down to the bottom of society--the clammy stillness created and maintained by the lie of silent-assertion that there wasn’t anything going on in which intelligent people were interested.

“The conspiracy of the silent-assertion lie is hard at work always and everywhere, and always in the interest of a stupidity (unlimited growth) or sham (unlimited immigration), never in the interest of the respectable (average citizens).  It is the most timid and shabby of all lies.  The silent-assertion is that nothing is going on which fair and intelligent men and women are aware of and are engaged by their duty to try to stop.”

‘Silent-assertion’ worked until it brought China, India and Bangladesh to their knees with sheer misery of numbers.  How do I know?  I’ve spent a lot of time in Asia and other overpopulated regions.  China, even with enforced one child per family, grows by 8 million annually. India, with 1.21 billion, adds 11 million net gain yearly.  Bangladesh suffers 157 million people in a landmass the size of Ohio.  Do you see anyone racing to immigrate to those havens of human overload?

Do we as a nation, want millions upon millions of added people from countries already exceeding their “carrying capacity”?  Legal immigration proves as dangerous as illegal.  To think otherwise will allow that ‘silent-assertion’ to create another China or India in America.  Just imagine Ohio with 157 million people and all the rest of the United States with THAT kind of population density!

Albert Einstein said, “The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them.”

We are no longer living in the 20th century America with only 75 million people riding horses or trains.  We’re in the 21st century with cars and jets and 315 million people added to the 7.1 billion on the planet—creating horrific environmental consequences.  Again, we had to change our ‘silent-assertion’ about slavery and we MUST change our ‘silent-assertion’ about population growth and economic growth.  If we continue steaming full speed ahead like the captain of the Titanic, our children will be on board when we hit the peak oil, global warming, ozone holes, collapsing species, air pollution and other commensurate problems related to the overpopulation “iceberg.”  Most died on the Titanic because there weren’t enough life boats.

Maybe some of us choose to maintain our ‘silent-assertion’ in the face of growing consequences, but how can any parent or grandparent be that callous to their children?  That gopher hole runs deep!

Dr. William Rees,ecological economist and former director of the University of British Columbia’s School of Community and Regional Planning in a blog June 12, 2012 , “The Use and Misuse of the Concept of Sustainability.” “The concepts of ‘sustainable development’ and ‘sustainability’ continue to be subverted, distorted and otherwise misused in the ongoing political debates concerning global change and economic development. Society continues to be in deep denial of fundamental facts pertaining to contemporary biophysical reality”.


 

This article was originally published in BeforeItsNews.com.

See Frosty Wooldridge's website How to Live a Life of Adventure.

  Read more about Thomas Malthus foretold humanity’s gravest plight with clarity

Social Contract Winter 2013 issue: Moving Forward

The Social Contract is a quarterly journal that addresses immigration issues, human population issues, language, assimilation, culture, and national unity considerations. The Winter 2013 issue "Moving Forward" is available online and contains a variety of articles related to immigration.

Here are direct links to the articles:

  1. A Note from the Editor: Opportunities for Immigration Reform by Wayne Lutton
  2. Looking Forward by Rick Oltman
  3. What if Romney had Won? by Dave Gibson
  4. Immigration and Education's Downward Spiral by Richard Pelto
  5. How Diversity Ideology Corrupts American Education by Brenda Walker
  6. We Shall Overwhelm* — FY 2003-12 by William Buchanan
  7. Victims of Illegal Immigration by Michael W. Cutler
  8. What Needs to Be Done with the Higher-Skilled Work Visa Programs Such as H-1B? by Gene Nelson
  9. The Consequences of Sanctuary Policies and What You Can Do about It by Dave Gibson
  10. Humanism and Rooted Diversity -Two foci of resistance to late modernity by Mark Wegierski
  11. The Next Amnesty Will Apply to 40 Million Illegal Aliens by Dave Gibson
  12. The Olduvai Theory - Heading into the Gorge by Richard C. Duncan
  13. Illegal Immigration and Marijuana: Can Smoking Weed Help? by Ed Rubenstein
  14. Environmentalism as Love of Home by Martin Witkerk
  15. The Obama Nation: We’re All Racists Now by Peter Gemma

From the Editor's Note:

Contrary to the claims of mass immigration proponents, Americans have never endorsed open borders. James Madison, in his famous report on immigration to the First Congress, succinctly stated what should be our policy:

Welcome every person of good fame that really means to incorporate himself into our society, but repel all who will not be a real addition to the wealth and strength of the United States.

As our Publisher, John Tanton, reminds us, the question then is: In order to best facilitate meeting the highest goals of the American people, (1) how many immigrants should we admit? (2) and who should be admitted?

As we enter the New Year, there are opportunities to inform our fellow citizens about how immigration policies impact other critical issues. In this edition, Rick Oltman proposes to reignite grass-roots efforts. Dave Gibson explains how citizens can raise awareness of the threat to public safety posed by illegal aliens...

Has Sen. Bennet really thought about immigration?

According to U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet's website, reforming immigration policy and combating climate change are two of his key legislative goals.

But there is no evidence that the senator sees any connection between them, despite the fact that the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has identified population growth as one of the two key drivers of global warming, and that most of the increase in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in the past two decades has occurred due to population growth, while per capita emissions have remained relatively flat.
 
While they have so far neglected to provide hard numbers, the Senate Gang of Eight proposes two changes that would greatly increase America's population. First, an immense amnesty covering up to 12 million illegal immigrants, who would then be able to bring in tens of millions of relatives under current "family reunification" rules. Second, a huge increase in legal immigration, among both unskilled and skilled workers ...
 
Using Census Bureau forecasting methods, here are projections for U.S. population growth during this century:
 
• 250,000 annual immigration = 379 million in 2100;
 
• 1.25 million annual immigration = 524 million in 2100; and
 
• 2.25 million annual immigration = 669 million in 2100;
 
As can readily be seen, even at present immigration rates, the U.S. is on track for huge population increases during the 21st century, from a current population of 315 million to 524 million people by 2100. It is not clear how such increases can be accommodated in an ecologically sustainable manner.
 
Further increasing America's already generous immigration rates, as proposed by Sen. Bennet, could add another 145 million people to our population. That increase itself is equal to almost half our current population. It would ensure that the U.S. more than doubles its total population by 2100, to 669 million people...
 
Finally, why should Coloradans put solar panels on our houses, purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles, tax ourselves to support mass transit, or do any of the 1,001 things environmentalists typically advocate to deal with climate change, if our elected officials are just going to negate those efforts by importing hundreds of millions more people into our country?
 
 
Philip Cafaro is a professor of philosophy at Colorado State University in Fort Collins

Book review:Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation

Parts one and two of an eight-part book review on:

Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation
Authors: Philip Cafaro, Eileen Crist
Publisher: The University of Georgia Press
ISBN: 978-0-8203-4385-3
Price: $24.95 www.amazon.com

 

The brilliant Harvard University biologist, Edward O. Wilson, addressed human overpopulation with this statement,

It’s not the Nature of human beings to be cattle in glorified feedlots. Every person deserves the option to travel easily in and out of the complex and primal world that gave us birth. We need freedom to roam across land owned by no one but protected by all, whose unchanging horizon is the same that bounded the world of our millennial ancestors. Only in what remains of Eden, teeming with life-forms independent of us, is it possible to experience the kind of wonder that shaped the human psyche at its birth.”

Unfortunately, as humanity piles itself up at 80 million net gain annually, 1 billion added every 12 years and on its way from 7.1 billion in 2013 to over 10.1 billion by 2050—all life on Earth faces a portentous path.

In the face of that future, Colorado State University philosophy Professor Philip Cafaro and Professor Eileen Crist of Virginia Tech, authored: Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation.

While many Americans watch the political unrest of countries in Africa such as Egypt, Syria and Libya, few connect the dots as to endless human population growth, food shortages, water depletion and energy exhaustion.

At an unsustainable 80 million today in Egypt, demographers project that country to exceed 138 million within 38 years. Their only form of birth control remains to dig yet another canal off the Nile River and fill it with mud dwellings, no sewer, little food and accelerating poverty. While Africa houses nearly 1 billion in 2013, that ancient land expects to grow to 1.8 billion by 2050 and on to 3.1 billion by the end of this century.

The question begs an answer: where will the wild things go for food, water and raising of their offspring? How will they survive the human horde scavenging the land for food? Answer: they won’t!

Today, over 2.5 to 3.0 billion people live on $2.00 per day. Over 2.5 billion lack toilets and running water. Yet, humanity plunges into accelerating fecundity with intrepid stupidity.

As of 2013, according to United Kingdom Oxford’s Norman Myers life-long studies on human encroachment on animal habitat around the world, extinction rates run from 80 to 100 creatures DAILY around the planet. Those numbers cannot help but accelerate with the added 3.1 billion added humans within 38 years.

Upwards of two hundred species…mostly of the large, slow-breeding variety…are becoming extinct here every day because more and more of the earth’s carrying capacity is systematically being converted into human carrying capacity. These species are being burnt out, starved out, and squeezed out of existence. Thanks to technologies that most people, I’m afraid, think of as technologies of peace. I hope it will not be too long before the technologies that support our population explosion begin to be perceived as no less hazardous to the future of life on this planet than the endless production of radioactive wastes.”
Daniel Quinn

In this book, Cafaro and Crist feature over a dozen of the finest environmental minds on the planet. These “Galileo’s of the 21st century” bring you the stark realities that humanity faces.

Can our species change course? It will take a “consciousness shift” through books like this one that educate Americans, Canadians, Europeans, Australians, Chinese, Indians, South Americans and Africans. Once educated, a profound “critical mass shift” must take the knowledge into action. That allows a “tipping point” where humanity stabilizes, then reduces its numbers gracefully via birth control and family planning all over the planet.

If we humans refuse to move on the knowledge within this book and many other emerging books like it, Mother Nature will bring her weight onto the environmental ball field. As we have seen with Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, she grows merciless. And, she always bats last.

This book must be read by every citizen and passed on to the leaders of all countries in order to create the new paradigm where humanity lives, works and stabilizes its numbers into a sustainable balance with all life on Earth.

“The raging monster upon the land is population growth. In its presence, sustainability is but a fragile theoretical construct. To say, as many do, that the difficulties of nations are not due to people, but to poor ideology and land-use management is sophistic.”
Harvard scholar and biologist E.O. Wilson

____

 

Part 2:

Have you ever seen the Great Pacific Garbage Patch? It encompasses a floating island of plastic debris out in the Pacific Ocean the size of Texas, about 60 to 90 feet thick, 1,000 miles off San Francisco. It kills millions of marine creatures and avian life in our oceans across the world annually. Over 46,000 pieces of plastic float on every square mile of Earth’s oceans. (Source: Whitty) Humans created it, but humans refuse to enact simple 10 cent deposit-return laws to stop it. Some estimates show humans tossing 2.5 million more plastic containers into the world’s oceans every hour.

Such a gross contamination of the oceans continues unabated because humans refuse to clean up after themselves. It brings the question: does any of the other life on Earth matter to human beings?

In the end, do we even care about our own species as we explode our numbers across the planet? Even as 10 million children starve to death annually around the world, we gallop recklessly forward to adding 3.1 billion of ourselves within 38 years. (Source: World Health Organization)

Canadian Reid Westland said,

There are some really unbelievable temperatures and fires in Australia with no let up in sight. Yet, no direct talk about global warming and no word on human numbers and behaviors contributing to it. We are going to have to be struck solidly between the eyes before any real concerted action is taken. Can you imagine the unrest when wheat hits $10.00 a bushel and corn holds a similar high, not to mention soybeans at $18.00 a bushel? Egypt is a hell hole now and they can’t feed themselves. How are they going to buy food? On credit! If there is insufficient grain and credit dries up, they will consume what little is left of the “natural world”. From 10 million elephants in 1900 to less than 470,000 in 2013, can you imagine as we eat and carve up the last of them for trinkets? We are at war with global warming and the enemy is us! We just refuse to face up to our actions and profligate numbers. We are at war with the natural world to keep our numbers growing! Wolves, grizzlies, mountain lions, deer, moose, elk and big horn sheep have lived in a dynamic state of equilibrium for eons. The great jungles and Serengeti’s of the earth weren’t denuded by any creature but man.”

In Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation by Professor Philip Cafaro of Colorado State University and Professor Eileen Crist of Virginia Tech, we find the top authors and scientists in the world attempting to alert humanity to its impending future viability on this planet.

Apparently, we humans lack the common sense of a Canadian goose. We fail to act on our present realities of pollution, poisons, cancers, scarce water supplies and dwindling energy sources on our breakneck race to add another 1.1 billion of ourselves every 12 years.

At this point, it’s almost certainly too late to manage a transition to sustainability on a global or national scale, even if the political will to attempt it existed, which it clearly does not. Our civilization is in the early stages of the same curve of decline and fall as so many others have followed before it. What likely lies in wait for us is a long, uneven decline into a new Dark Age from which, centuries from now, the civilizations of the future will gradually emerge.”

That quote does not warrant manifestation if we take action in 2013. It will certainly manifest if we fail to act.

Crist and Cafaro said,

The explosion of humanity has decimated many animal and plant populations, extinguished species and sub-species, and caused collapsing ecologies and the shrinking and fragmentation of wild places. Ocean life has been reduced to food and by-catch; rainforests razed for meat and soybeans, boreal forests cut down for wood, mountains detonated for coals and natural gas and grasslands overgrazed and converted strictly into human breadbaskets while freshwaters are dammed, dumped into, overfished and channelized.”

All of these actions destroy animal habitat and reduce wildlife to penury on a scale that few understand or see. Both authors submit that humanity must change course and make radical changes in the human population equation.

Cafaro and Crist said, “We have to make revolutionary changes in how we live on Earth—including limiting how many of us inhabit it.”

Less than 150 years ago, we humans counted a total of 1.5 billion of our numbers. Today, at 7.1 billion and adding 80 million net gain annually, 1 billion every 12 years—none of the other creatures on this planet stand a chance as we devour everything in sight—water, energy, land, food, resources and more.

Our greatest challenge stems from the fact that most of us cannot and do not “see” what damage we wreck upon the Earth. Not 1 percent of humanity has seen or knows about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Not 1 percent of humanity knows that human encroachment on habitat causes the extinction of 80 to 100 creatures daily in 2013 and that’s been proceeding for over 30 years as our numbers explode. Not 1 percent of humanity is doing anything about it.

This book will bring it home to you. It will prove one of the most important books of the 21st century. Let’s learn and let’s change course.

We’ve poured our poisons into the world as though it were a bottomless pit…and we go on gobbling them up. It’s hard to imagine how the world could survive another century of this abuse, but nobody’s really doing anything about it. It’s a problem our children will have to solve, or their children.”
Daniel Quinn

At some point, the problem will become unsolvable and irreversible. Which means all life on Earth will suffer enormous consequences.

 

Read all eight parts of the book review: Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation.

 


Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents – from the Arctic to the South Pole – as well as eight times across the USA, coast to coast and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle, Norway to Athens, Greece. In 2012, he bicycled coast to coast across America. His latest book is: How to Live a Life of Adventure: The Art of Exploring the World by Frosty Wooldridge, copies at 1-888-280-7715. Motivational program: How to Live a Life of Adventure: The Art of Exploring the World by Frosty Wooldridge. Read more about Book review:Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation

Colorado River Seen as Depleting resource

...rising demand and falling supply have water managers in the arid West considering a host of other options to deal with dire projections that the Colorado River - the main water supply for a region larger than the country of France - won't be able over the next 50 years to meet demands of a regional population now about 40 million and growing.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar issued what he termed "a call to action" with a three-year study of the river, its flows and its ability to meet the future needs of city-dwellers, Native Americans, businesses, ranchers and farmers in seven Western states.

"We are in a troubling trajectory in the Colorado River basin, as well as the Rio Grande basin," Salazar told reporters on a conference call outlining the math in the findings of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study...

Salazar and Bureau of Reclamation officials warned that the Colorado River's historical 15 million acre-feet per year flow has been reduced by 12 years of drought to about 12 million acre-feet. Officials say an acre-foot can meet the water needs of up two families per year.

Water interests and the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming together lay claim to all the water in the river and then some.

Mexico also has a stake in the river, and officials last month set new rules to share Colorado River water south of the border and let Mexico store water in Lake Mead near Las Vegas.

The study projects that by 2060 the river flow could fall 3.2 million to 8 million acre-feet short of regional needs...

Carly Jerla, a federal Bureau of Reclamation analyst, told reporters the range of future growth scenarios went from a small increase to doubling the regional population...


CAIRCO comments:

Because of mass immigration, United States population is projected to double with the lifetimes of children born today. The water crisis may be viewed from two perspectives. One is that it is the result of a "water shortage". But the sad reality is that is the result of a "people longage" - there are simply too many people demanding limited supplies of sustaining water.


The US takes in millions of people each year from countries like Mexico, which draws down our environmental resources at even faster rates. This acts as a population safety relief valve for those countries. They can simply export their excess population to the US without having to address population and quality of life issues at home.
Read more about Colorado River Seen as Depleting resource

Video: Who Killed Economic Growth?

Our modern economic-political system is built around the premise of infinte growth, particularly in the United States. More immigrants and more illegal aliens means more consumers - precisely what our commanding corporate interests insist upon. Both political parties implicitly support this growth. However, many point out that we can not grow forever on a finite planet.

In this six minute animated video Addicted to Growth, Richard Heinberg notes that humanity has reached a point where continued physical growth is reaching natural limits. It's worth watching, and the 3D animation is pretty good.

Here's the link to the video on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQqDS9wGsxQ .

Heinburg has also published a book on The End of Growth - Adapting to Our New Economic Reality. Read more about Video: Who Killed Economic Growth?

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - environment