Bo Winegard: 6 traits of progressivism

Bo Winegard’s analysis of progressivism on Quillette may be of interest:

Progressivism and the West, by Bo Winegard, March 9, 2019.

Here’s the gist: Winegard detects six characteristics or traits of progressives:

  1. Progressives misunderstand human nature: they assume groups are “roughly equal on all socially-valued traits.” Policy prescriptions based on this false assumption inevitably violate “basic nations of fairness,” inflame resentments, and decrease social productivity and efficiency.
     
  2. Progressives elevate “victims,” encouraging victimhood. Because blatant discrimination is vanishingly rare, progressives must seek “smaller and more subtle forms of victimization.” The rewards for victims teaches them “insecurity and haplessness” instead of “confidence and resilience.” placing victims on pedestals invites hate crime hoaxes. Perpetrators of ever more subtle “crimes” against perceived victims are “reviled and ostracized.”
  3. Progressives will censor speech that puts sacred victims in a bad light.
  4. In their moral crusades progressives will jettison due process and the presumption of innocence.
  5. Progressives are prone to mobocracy and to disproportionate punishment.
  6. Progressives hold the West and its icons in contempt because of its rapacious imperialism, racism and patriarchy.


Below are “take-away” quotes on each trait:

1) Progressives misunderstand human nature

Progressives misunderstand human nature: they assume groups are “roughly equal on all socially-valued traits.” Policy prescriptions based on this false assumption inevitably violate “basic nations of fairness,” inflame resentments, and decrease social productivity and efficiency:

“Progressivism . . . holds that, inter alia: (1) All demographic groups are roughly equal on all socially valued traits; (2) racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry are ubiquitous; (3) almost all demographic disparities are caused by unfair discrimination; (4) diversity is an unalloyed good; and (5) there are many bigots who stand in the way of social progress, but eventually history will redeem the noble and we will inhabit a just society . . .

“But, because demographic groups are different from each other, the only way to achieve this equality is to contravene principles of procedural fairness and to promote people not because of talent but because of their demographic profiles. This, however, only increases society’s obsession with demographic characteristics, violates basic notions of fairness, inflames ugly resentments, and decreases social productivity and efficiency because it misallocates human talent. Better, it seems, is to stick with the West’s great achievement in promoting a largely meritocratic society in which talent and skill are rewarded with pay and status and employers are encouraged to ignore irrelevant immutable characteristics such as race or sex and to live with the inevitable disparities, knowing that most of them are not caused by malice but by natural variation.”
 

2) Progressives elevate “victims,” encouraging victimhood

Progressives elevate “victims,” encouraging victimhood. Because blatant discrimination is vanishingly rare, progressives must seek “smaller and more subtle forms of victimization.” The rewards for victims teaches them “insecurity and haplessness” instead of “confidence and resilience.” placing victims on pedestals invites hate crime hoaxes. Perpetrators of ever more subtle “crimes” against perceived victims are “reviled and ostracized”:

“Progressivism’s most powerful sacred value is the protection and elevation of perceived victims groups such as blacks, Muslims, homosexuals, women, and other marginalized minorities or putatively oppressed peoples . . . For thousands of years, according to this perspective, these groups have been oppressed, harassed, maligned, and disrespected in reprehensible ways; and even today, they are subject to overt and subtle forms of discrimination and invidious stereotypes. Therefore, we should work indefatigably to draw attention to injustices, to rectify past wrongs, and to dismantle the machinery of oppression that is built into Western society . . .

“The problem with this view is that, despite some obvious and widely denounced counter-examples, actual instances of blatant discrimination or racism in the West are vanishingly rare; therefore, progressive activists are constantly searching for smaller and more subtle forms of victimization . . . aided by increasingly elaborate and decreasingly plausible theories of oppression . . . A large demand for evidence of bigotry has vastly outgrown the supply, potentially leading to a variety of hate-crime hoaxes . . .

“Victim culture also encourages people to feel slighted by subtle, unintentional infractions because it rewards victims with prestige. Instead of teaching confidence and resilience, it teaches insecurity and haplessness. Perceived victims soak in sympathy and righteous tribalism, while perpetrators of these subtle ‘crimes’ are reviled and ostracized. This creates understandable bitterness and resentment and alienates more and more people from social justice ideologies because they are horrified by their overreach and fearful that they might be accused of some ghastly and unforgivable sin and forced to withstand a public ordeal . . .”
 

3) Progressives will censor speech that puts sacred victims in a bad light

“The temptation, of course, is always to promote freedom for opinions one likes while encouraging censorship for those one doesn’t, especially if the disliked opinions are perceived as legitimately harmful to vulnerable populations. Because of its emphasis on victims and its contention that Western society is teeming with bigotry, progressivism makes this temptation virtually irresistible to believers.

“. . . This intolerance for certain forms of speech appears to be spreading, infecting elite corporations who often posture as socially righteous businesses and who likely fear besmirching their images by allowing heterodox opinions to go unpunished (see James Damore, for example).

“More recently, these battles have focused on new sacred values about human nature. As noted, progressive ideology appears to adhere to notions of cosmic egalitarianism, or the belief that there are few or no genetically caused demographic differences. Therefore, adherents are particularly offended by science that contends that there are such differences and often morally denounce the scientists who pursue such topics, accusing them of unseemly motives or “fetishes” and potentially even malignant biases. These accusations are potentially damaging, causing professors to self-censor and, what is perhaps worse, to encourage others to self-censor. Creating a stifling atmosphere and fostering resentments and suspicions, this current tendency to moralize inquiry has likely thwarted progress in the social sciences and has potentially created entire disciplines whose chief function is to provide theoretical support for progressive ideology rather than to pursue the truth wherever the evidence may lead . . .

“Of course, words can cause emotional distress and science can shatter comforting myths. Indeed, in many ways, science is a great destroyer, mercilessly reshaping our narratives about reality. But, these emotional inconveniences are more than recompensed by free inquiry and exchange. Free speech allows us to test ideas by having them encounter skepticism. Sometimes they triumph. Sometimes they transform. And sometimes they perish. Without this clash of contradictions, ideas become bloated and stale and errors and imprecisions accumulate. Even good ideas congeal into uninspiring dogmas. And, worse, as we stifle scientific freedom, our ability to understand the world is diminished, potentially depriving us of effective solutions to vexing problems. Disparaging scholars who pursue taboo topics might be temporarily satisfying, but it is ultimately damaging to the entire scientific enterprise, which requires us to steadfastly protect the pursuit for truth whatever its discomforts.”
 

4) In their moral crusades progressives will jettison due process and the presumption of innocence

“Like free speech, due process and the presumption of innocence are likely not ‘natural,’ and were won through many centuries of struggle among citizens, parliaments, and kings. Humans are vindictive and desirous to punish those perceived or accused of violating social norms. Perfunctory assessments of the evidence will often satisfy any lingering doubts about guilt, especially if the accused is disliked or a political enemy. Therefore, it is imperative that society insists upon the presumption of innocence and the rights of the accused. Without such insistence, natural propensities lead to cycles of incriminations and punishment with little concern for guilt and with little protection for those wrongly accused.”
 

5) Progressives are prone to mobocracy and to disproportionate punishment

“Moral righteousness, however, is a powerful and blinding emotion, impelling individuals to inflict horrible suffering on others to ‘balance the scales of justice.’ And so thousands of Twitter users, encouraged by narratives about ubiquitous racism and the urgent need to battle against bigotry, delighted in destroying [Justine] Sacco’s reputation and her career while causing her unknown and unimaginable amounts of suffering. This example has replayed many, many times since, leading to the term ‘cancelled,’ in which justice mobs jettison a transgressor from decent society altogether (and then brag about it).

[Sacco, while flying to South Africa in December, 2013, tweeted “Going to Africa. Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just kidding. I’m white!” End of career]

“...We should be wary of promoting an ideology that dresses our demons as avenging angels and relishes the righteous suffering they cause. History is full of unfortunate examples in which a fever of sanctimony led to the destruction of thousands, even millions, of lives. People in the West have worked sedulously to discourage such moralistic barbarism and have rewarded its lucky inhabitants with a largely enlightened criminal justice system.
 

6) Progressives hold the West and its icons in contempt because of its rapacious imperialism, racism and patriarchy

“According to progressivism, the West is today’s predominant culture because of its rapacious imperialism. It brutalizes and exploits people and then uses their blood, sweat, and tears to fuel its insatiable lust for conquest. Furthermore, it is a racist patriarchy, a civilization built on war abroad and on oppression and injustice at home. Celebrated intellectuals eagerly encourage this narrative, documenting the myriad crimes of the West, from Columbus to Clinton. One-sided books contribute to a Manichean history of an unflagging battle of the overwhelmed but never-vanquished forces of justice against the rulers of Western civilization. “One time heroes of the West such as Washington, Jefferson, Wilson, and Churchill are now pilloried as grotesque white male racists, unambiguous oppressors who deserve obloquy for their heinous crimes and beliefs. Even quoting one of these once revered people approvingly, astronaut Scott Kelly discovered, can invite intense criticism and scorn. Healthy but complicated discussions about changing the names of certain buildings or taking down the statues of Confederate war leaders are routinely escalated as ideologues search for a wider pantheon of historical fiends to be stripped of their status and removed from history.”

 

Read the complete article: Progressivism and the West, by Bo Winegard, March 9, 2019.

CAIRCO Research

The Political Spectrum

Bull Moose Progressives and the liberal paradigm

Our House Divided: Multiculturalism vs. America, by Thomas D. Klingenstein, American mind, originally published October 31, 2018.