What's the big deal with the global culture war?

In the United States, the culture war can loosely be defined as the battle between those who adhere to conservative, traditional, and consitutional views and "woke" progressive Leftists who espouse political correctness, diversity, identity group politics, and belief in more than two biological sexes.

Mass immigration is a tool of the global elites and of the Left - that is, of the Democrat party - to fragment American society and to displace those who adhere to traditional American values and the foundational premise of our Constitutional Republic. In other words, to disempower Whites, who will become a minority in their own country by mid-century. This isn't a slur on Blacks or any other nationality, but in essence it is White Europeans who invented and perpetuated Western Civilization. This great displacement of Whites is therefore synonymous with the displacement of Western Civilization. 

In Canada, it's the same, only worse. There is no fundamental protection of freedom of speech as there is in the U.S. Indeed, Canada has hate speech laws which are readily interpreted to restrict criticism of mass immigration and the agenda of political Islam.

Western Europe is much like Canada, only worse still. European nations have been systematically overwhelmed with hostile, unassimilable Islamists - Muslims. For the most part, individuals are prohibited from discussing and objecting to the invasion.

In all of these nations, the outcome is converging on displacing the native population (e.g., Whites) who perpetuate Western Civilization. The fabric of Western Civilization is under significant threat. While we like to think that the great works of art, music, and architecture of Western Civilization will be revered and preserved forever, all of it is on the chopping block.

In the January 25, 2020 American Greatness article, In the Global Culture War, People and Paintings Are Both at Risk, Karl Spence explains how much is at stake. The article is well worth reading in its entirety. Here are a few excerpts:

... the global war we face today puts everything—both civilian lives and cultural artifacts—at grave risk....

This war is not properly called a “Global War on Terror.” I wish it were, because the reality of what we're up against is far more terrifying than that. Islam is one of the world's great religions, and it didn't get that way by being what George W. Bush liked to call it: “a religion of peace,” hijacked on 9/11 by a few terrorist renegades. Before that dreadful day, I had never given the matter three minutes' thought, and I doubt Bush had, either. I also doubt that he or any infidel understands Islam better than the men did who had been living and breathing it all their lives and had just killed 3,000 of us in a single morning.

I call the war a culture war because, like Otto von Bismarck's original Kulturkampf, it is a struggle over whose values, beliefs, and practices will prevail. And it's far worse than most culture wars, for while such wars waged domestically are largely a matter of polemics and politics, the global culture war is a shooting war, and it's been one for a very long time.

It has been going on for centuries, ever since Mohammed marched on Mecca. Thus say students of Islam such as Ibn Warraq, Andrew Bostom, Raymond Ibrahim, and Robert Spencer. Uncounted thousands of lives over the years have been lost to it, and it may yet claim millions. We didn't start the war, and we may never see its end. But we can't wriggle out of it. We must fight and, please God, win. And, pace Saffran, we may find that in this war, paintings are sometimes more important than people.

But when the Taliban demolished the Buddhas of Bamyan, I wondered: What would become of the world's other cultural treasures should such people ever gain control over us?

Would any paintings at all survive? What are they worth to us? How many lives would it cost to keep the jihadists' hands off the Sistine Chapel and the Mona Lisa?

I worry about music, too. Some Muslims hold that only vocal music is permissible, that instrumental music is forbidden. Would this put paid to the compositions of Mozart, Handel, Schubert, the "three-Bs"; and the rest? Such music is, as the saying goes, “to die for.” Is it also music to kill for?

And if the classics seem too musty and high-brow for you, check out Mark Steyn's take on this popular tune...

I'm a reasonable chap, and I'd be willing to meet the Muslim Brotherhood chaps halfway on a lot of the peripheral stuff like beheadings, stonings, clitoridectomies and whatnot. But you'll have to pry "Baby, It's Cold Outside" from my cold dead hands and my dancing naked legs. A world without "Baby, It's Cold Outside" would be very cold indeed....

What's certain is that many more deaths, and much more destruction, await us in the Global Culture War. Get ready for it.



Migration Madness Syndrome, by Bill Warner [of Political Islam], May 2, 2018:

Europe’s Elite want their citizens to believe open borders and migration from Islamic countries will solve their need for a future workforce due to a shrinking population. I call their bluff. If they need workers, why not get them from the poorer parts of the EU–Romania, Bulgaria, Greece? This isn’t about guest workers. This is about the Left securing a voting block so they can be voted into office in perpetuity.  Islam makes for a perfect partner in their endeavor to achieve political dominance. Both conspire to tear down society and rebuild their utopian ideal. What the Left doesn’t realize is when Islam ultimately takes power, as it tends to do, the last laugh will be on the them, just as it was with the Tudeh Party in Iran. In the end, Islam has no loyalty to Kafirs, only to Allah and Mohammed.

To understand Islamic migration today, it is imperative to understand the concept of hijra. The hijra dates to the time of Mohammed when he left Mecca and moved to Medina where he became a warlord and politician. Mohammed’s migration, or hijra, is so important to the success of Islam that it is the basis for the Islamic calendar.

Hijra is a form of soft jihad and is quite effective for spreading Islam. Al Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki stated, referring to doctrine: “Jihad today is obligatory on every capable Muslim…it is your duty to find ways to practice it and support it.” He then lists 44 ways to support jihad. In #36 Preparing for Hijrah, al-Awlaki quotes Mohammed: “Hijrah does not stop as long as there is an enemy to fight”.  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Al Qaeda 9/11 mastermind, said, “the practical way to defeat America is through immigration and “outbreeding non-Muslims”.  These jihadists are not creating new ideas. They are repeating 1400 year old doctrine.

The bottom line: Hijra is a tactic to pave the way for Sharia.

Ultimately, the danger of migration is not that there will be too many unemployed workers draining welfare dollars from the state, but it’s that Sharia supremacists will keep Islamicizing the EU.  These guest workers aren’t going home. They have a religious duty to stay and fulfill the doctrine. Their loyalty is to Allah and Mohammed, not to the Kafir countries of the West. History has shown that once a nation is invaded by Islam, it will become 100% Islamic, unless driven out....