SCOTUS is turning the US Constitution into a UN constitution
The recent Supreme Court decision on birthright citizenship is a fascinating legal artifact because it provides several lessons on how "law" can be abused by turning it into an exercise of wish fulfillment, instead of a responsibility for discipline.
The Court majority writes as if it represents all of humanity, instead of U.S. citizens and their country...
Giving U.S. citizenship to offspring of illegal invaders is not a legal consideration, and doesn’t belong in a court. It got there because the Left can only hide prior legal violations - illegal open borders - with subsequent legal machinery, by subjecting the certainty of national sovereignty to the uncertainty of courts...
Illegal birthright is instead a matter of vital presidential judgement over national security that was appropriated by false appeal to judicial review...
The four female Justices arguably acted in solidarity under a potent ideological mix of female liberation, and race...
... it was Alito who never lost sight of what the case was actually about, and said it directly with the fewest words: US national sovereignty...
... It doesn’t occur to the Left that birthright is a claim for benefits made by individuals who want something from someone else: you...
The Constitution continues to be stretched into an effective global international charter by pulling the 14th Amendment out of its limited context, and signaling to the world that it can blanket humanity with rights that they haven’t earned...
Related
Schweizer: More than a Million 'U.S. Citizens' Being Raised in China Due to Birth Tourism, Breitbart, 2 July 2026.
SCOTUS Sadly Affirms Birthright Citizenship
SCOTUS Doesn't Have The Final Word On Birthplace Citizenship
SCOTUS: The Predictable Disaster - video
Birthright Citizenship: Suicide of America via SCOTUS
The Predictable Disaster - video
Misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution
Anchor babies, birthright citizenship, and the 14th Amendment
Birthright Citizenship: The Court Pointed the Way, by Frank Miele, Heartland Dairy USA, 12 July 2026:
... Even though Trump could not on his own change the application of the 14thAmendment's citizenship clause, Kavanaugh said Congress could.
"If Congress amends [the Nationality Act, a 1940 law that statutorily recognized Supreme Court precedent on birthright citizenship] or otherwise enacts a statute creating new exceptions along the lines of the Executive Order for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country, such a statute, as I see it, would pass constitutional muster," Kavanaugh wrote...
Section 5 of the 14th Amendment explicitly gave Congress the power to resolve the issue through legislation...
What is needed is legislation to define the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction." The phrase itself remains undefined in the Constitution...
Majority Leader John Thune has shown himself unwilling to discard the filibuster for the sake of the election reforms contained in the SAVE America Act. But maybe if the future of the country were on the line with an opportunity to redefine citizenship, Thune would find his courage...
