SCOTUS: The Predictable Disaster - video

Article subtitle: 
The "conservative" Supreme Court backs birthright citizenship
Article author: 
Kevin DeAnna
Article publisher: 
American Renaissance
Article date: 
1 July 2026
Article category: 
Our American Future
Medium
Article Body: 

Just because it was expected doesn't make it easier to bear. The "conservative" Supreme Court backs birthright citizenship and this proves the ultimate incoherence of trusting in mere institutions or the letter of the law to save us. However, longtime immigration activist and author Peter Brimelow suggests that there is a white pill, because the victory is that the once fringe issue has now been introduced into the mainstream and provides a weapon for taking over the Right.

Identity Politics (Ep. 136): The Predictable Disaster:

Related

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.
The legislative not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary on the contrary has no influence over either the sword or the purse, no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.
- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist 78, New York, 28 May 1788

 

The Legal Reality of Birthright Citizenship and the Supreme Court's Defection, Victor Davis Hanson, Daily Signal, 7 July 2026:

 

SCOTUS Sadly Affirms Birthright Citizenship

SCOTUS Doesn't Have The Final Word On Birthplace Citizenship

Birthright Citizenship: The Court Pointed the Way, by Frank Miele, Heartland Dairy USA, 12 July 2026:

... Even though Trump could not on his own change the application of the 14thAmendment's citizenship clause, Kavanaugh said Congress could.

"If Congress amends [the Nationality Act, a 1940 law that statutorily recognized Supreme Court precedent on birthright citizenship] or otherwise enacts a statute creating new exceptions along the lines of the Executive Order for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country, such a statute, as I see it, would pass constitutional muster," Kavanaugh wrote...

Section 5 of the 14th Amendment explicitly gave Congress the power to resolve the issue through legislation...

What is needed is legislation to define the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction." The phrase itself remains undefined in the Constitution...

Majority Leader John Thune has shown himself unwilling to discard the filibuster for the sake of the election reforms contained in the SAVE America Act. But maybe if the future of the country were on the line with an opportunity to redefine citizenship, Thune would find his courage...

SCOTUS is turning the US Constitution into a UN constitution, by Matthew G. Andersson, American Thinker, 1 July 2026.

Citizenship Cannot Be a Souvenir, by Benjamin M. Osborne, Chronicles, 1 July 2026.

Like Rain in the Night

Birthright Citizenship: Suicide of America via SCOTUS

Werewolves of London, by James Howard Kunstler, 6 July 2026.

Misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution

Anchor babies, birthright citizenship, and the 14th Amendment