They're Going to STEAL the Election

Article author: 
Tucker Carlson
Article publisher: 
Article date: 
9 March 2024
Article category: 
National News
Article Body: 

Tucker Carlson: "They're Going to STEAL the Election"

"Joe Biden can't win in a fair election," said @TuckerCarlson

"So what does that tell you?" he asked.

"Well, they're going to steal the election. And we know they're going to steal the election because they're now saying so out loud."

"The chief law enforcement officer of the United States [Merrick Garland] government is telling you that it's immoral, in fact racist, in fact illegal, to ask people for their IDs when they vote to verify they are who they say they are."


Vigilant Fox: Tucker Carlson, "They're Going to STEAL the Election", by Vigilant Fox, Gateway Pundit, 8 March 2024:

... Carlson declared, "Joe Biden can't win in a fair election. Joe Biden will lose in November. He cannot win. That's the thing that nobody in any media wants to say out loud. In a fair election, Joe Biden cannot win."

He highlighted that media pundits like Chris Hayes are gaslighting the public by saying things like "Joe Biden is good at politics." But Carlson contested how Joe Biden can be "good at politics" when Trump is crushing him in the polls...

"Joe Biden is getting stomped by Donald Trump, but he's also, at the same time, ‘good at politics'? Carlson asked. "Right." (sarcasm)

"So what does that tell you?" he posed. "Well, they're going to steal the election," he answered. "And we know they're going to steal the election because they're now saying so out loud."

Carlson played a clip of Attorney General Merrick Garland saying that it is "discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary" to require voter ID...

"The chief law enforcement officer of the United States government is telling you that it's immoral, in fact racist, in fact illegal, to ask people for their IDs when they vote to verify they are who they say they are. What is that?" Carlson asked...

Carlson challenged claims that voter ID laws are discriminatory because they prevent people of color, particularly Black individuals, from voting due to a supposed lack of access to government-issued ID. He finds this argument contradictory because living in the U.S. requires a government-issued ID for many essential activities, such as flying, banking, interacting with government agencies, staying in hotels, and using credit cards.

The conservative commentator also pointed out the irony in the push towards a cashless society by some of the same people who argue against voter ID laws, noting that even attending events or making purchases now often requires a credit card, which in turn requires an ID. He suggests there's a double standard in considering it racist to require ID for voting but not for other aspects of life that require identification.

"Have you been to a stadium event recently?" Carlson posed. "No cash accepted. You have to have a credit card. And in order to get a credit card, you need a state-issued ID. And somehow, that's not racist. But it is racist to ask people to prove their identity when they choose the next president of the United States."...


How the Democrats Plan To Steal the Election, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., 18 March 2024:

... What if Biden’s elite gang of neo-con controllers won’t let Biden lose?

How can they stop him from losing? Simple. If it looks like he’s losing, the elite forces will create enough fake ballots to ensure victory. Our corrupt courts won’t stop them. They have done this before, and they will do it again, if they have to...

Dr. Naomi Wolf explains how electronic voting machines make it easier to steal elections:

"People could steal elections in this 'analog' technology of paper and locked ballot boxes, of course, by destroying or hiding votes, or by bribing voters, a la Tammany Hall, or by other forms of wrongdoing, so security and chain of custody, as well as anti-corruption scrutiny, were always needed in guaranteeing accurate election counts. But there was no reason, with analog physical processing of votes, to query the tradition of the secret ballot.

Before the digital scanning of votes, you could not hack a wooden ballot box; and you could not set an algorithm to misread a pile of paper ballots. So, at the end of the day, one way or another, you were counting physical documents.

Those days are gone, obviously, and in many districts there are digital systems reading ballots."...

"I would really like to think that when we talk about security of elections, we’re talking about more than just the security of the internet," Juno said. "You know, it has to be security of the physical location, where you’re not giving a third party keys to where you have your election equipment."...

The plan by Democratic strategists to bring activist groups into election offices worked in part because no legislature had ever imagined that a nonprofit could take over so many election offices so easily...

What happened in Green Bay happened in Democrat-run cities and counties across the country. Four hundred million Zuckerbucks were distributed with strings attached. Officials were required to work with "partner organizations" to massively expand mail-in voting and staff their election operations with partisan activists. The plan was genius. And because no one ever imagined that the election system could be privatized in this way, there were no laws to prevent it.

Such laws should now be a priority.” See here...


Arizona Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote is Not Discriminatory - Judicial Ruling